Search for: "State v. Mobil Oil Corp."
Results 161 - 180
of 204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 11:05 am
Plaintiffs then cleverly argued that a picture can be equivalent to a word mark, as in Mobil Oil Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 10:49 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 882 F.2d 490, 493 (11th Cir. 1989) (stating in a commercial lease setting that Florida courts require a plaintiff to show both procedural and substantive unconscionability). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 9:03 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 882 F.2d 490, 493 (11th Cir. 1989) (stating in a commercial lease setting that Florida courts require a plaintiff to show both procedural and substantive unconscionability). [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
Click Here States Settle With Plant Polluting Region’s Air. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
Click Here States Settle With Plant Polluting Region’s Air. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Their cars got terrible gas mileage and leaked oil and besides all that, their executives still looked like they were living in the 1950s. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
In a class certification appeal, the Court speaks to the UCC's good-faith requirement Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 7:33 am
ExxonMobile Corp., Civ. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:33 am
ExxonMobile Corp., Civ. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:40 pm
It is important to note that another federal district court (Northern District of California) in the case of Native Village of Kivalina v Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Army Corps of Engineers for another look. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:25 am
Mobil Oil Corp., 892 F.2d 115 (1989): `A 'fraud on the court' occurs where it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system's ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party's claim or defense.' Rockdale Mgmt. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
See Pony Express Courier Corp. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 11:41 pm
Exxon Mobil, the biggest U.S. oil company, may face millions of dollars in damages. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:43 am
Owners Corp. v Division of Hous. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:51 pm
(Exxon Mobil v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition (federal respondents) Brief in opposition (Alabama and Florida) Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 08-212 Title: Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
After that hearing, at which scientific literature was introduced and doctors for both the planitiffs and defendants testified, Justice Mayer ruled that plaintiffs would not be allowed to offer expert testimony at trial in support of their MCS claims:In New York, evidence based on novel scientific theories or techniques is considered admissible only upon a showing of general acceptance within the relevant scientific community (People v Carrieri, 49 AD3d 660, 854 NYS2d 427 [2d Dept 2008];… [read post]
