Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 161 - 180
of 76,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
State, No. 1042, September Term, 1996 (filed April 4, 1997) (affirming judgments of conviction); State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 2:56 pm
Olsen v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:20 am
« Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
In Byrd v United States, 584 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm
It argued that a decision from 1945, International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A plea bargain offered by a foreign prosecutor to an accused person whose extradition was sought, particularly if offered during a regulated process of plea-bargaining, did not constitute an abuse of process unless it was so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:25 am
FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 696; [2010] WLR (D) 152 “Where a person who had been granted leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom for a year or more appealed against the refusal of his claim for asylum under s 83 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 he was entitled, by virtue of the principle of equivalence under Community law, to include the refusal of his claim for humanitarian protection in the… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
McKinnon v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 59; [2008] WLR (D) 266 “A foreign prosecuting authority's plea bargain offer to an accused person whose extradition was sought, did not constitute an abuse of process unless the predicted consequences of refusing the offer were so extreme as to amount to a threat of unlawful action which imperilled the integrity of the extradition process. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 10:41 am
Hollaway v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 1:30 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0523, 2010 MT 191, STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In United States v Stitt, decided on December 10, 2018, the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 1:02 pm
The Court held, relying on Young v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
I appreciate the chance to engage with CoOp readers on the United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 4:50 am
United States (09-1227), a case covered earlier here and here. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:05 am
United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
First, in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating… [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
