Search for: "State v. Pitts" Results 161 - 180 of 319
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 9:50 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like its federal counterpart, Iowa Rule of Evidence 5.803(3) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement of the declarant’s then existing state of mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental... [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
The transatlantic travails of celebrities including Justin Timberlake, Britney Spears, Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Lopez and the Jolie-Pitts are listed over 8 pages among others who have crossed the ocean in search of a remedy (as well as one who notoriously asserted his right not to cross it). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:06 am by Jeffrey Brown
This week, Cybercrime Review is featuring a series of posts that takes a look at how federal and state courts are applying the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:55 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
First State Bank of Deanville, 747 S.W.2d 783, 785 (Tex. 1988)); Pitts & Collard, L.L.P. v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:23 am by Irene C. Olszewski, Esq.
Theatre Works recording of “8” features an all-star cast led by Golden Globe Award-winner and Academy and Emmy Award-nominee Brad Pitt as United States District Chief Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by INFORRM
That will simply not be acceptable.simply not be acceptable.” Research & resources New publications ‘Freedom of Information and the seven year itch’ – by Timothy Pitt-Payne QC, 11KBW, a paper at the 11KBW Information law seminar on 15th March 2012. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
These include: Victoria Beckham v Bauer, where Mrs Beckham commenced proceedings in respect of the publication of a story concerning invented telephone calls and text messages between herself and her husband David Beckham; and Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie v New Group Newspapers, where the couple commenced proceedings against the publisher of News of the World concerning a story which detailed their alleged visit to a divorce lawyer in December 2009 at which time they… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:45 am by GPL
 The discretionary function exception is limited, the Court stated, to "basic governmental policy decisions," and they key issue is the difference between design & day-to-day operational decisions v. policy decisions. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:14 am by Rachit Buch
The process to be followed in Article 8 claims is straightforward, and is summarised by Immigration Judge Pitt in this case at paragraph 15, which mentions the leading case of R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27. [read post]