Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2009, 9:39 am
With respect to the remaining appeal by Minnesota and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, those parties have failed to show that the district court abused its discretion by vacating sua sponte [acting spontaneously without prompting from another party] the injunction's air-emissions programs as the State and the agency have sufficient regulatory tools to monitor and control the plant's fibre emissions in ways which parallel the injunction. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:44 pm
The CSAPR sets limits on sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides from power plants in 28 upwind states in the eastern part of the country. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
’ ConocoPhillips Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:06 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:10 am
He came back, was caught, and now argues that cultivation is not an aggravated felony because the state statute (California) lists such things as cultivating, planting, harvesting, drying and processing. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:11 am
Supreme Court’s April 19 decision in Hughes v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:32 pm
In Government of the Province of Manitoba v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:27 pm
he United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") justifies the Plant Protection Act ("PPA")(7 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 11:28 pm
he United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") justifies the Plant Protection Act ("PPA")(7 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
The FDA recently sent warning letters to officials with a seafood processing plant in Brooklyn, NY, and a company in Puerto Rico that makes seasoning mixes for export to the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 4:27 pm
In Cavel International, Inc., v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
Writing for himself in Box v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:57 pm
See, Chevron USA Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 8:30 pm
” Tone Bros. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The 1938 ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
Plaintiffs claim that global warming, to which Defendants contribute as the "five largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the United States and . . . among the largest in the world," Connecticut v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:50 am
United States v. [read post]
