Search for: "State v. Ponds" Results 161 - 180 of 433
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2016, 8:12 am by Simon Lester
On the contrary, in US – Softwood Lumber V (Article 21.5 – Canada), the Appellate Body emphasized the exceptional nature of the W-T comparison methodology. 395 In US – Zeroing (Japan), the Appellate Body stated that "[t]he asymmetrical methodology in the second sentence is clearly an exception to the comparison methodologies which normally are to be used. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 7:34 pm by Joe Koncelik
If it does impact a navigable water in that manner, then it falls under federal jurisdiction A key issue at the trial of Joseph David Anderson was whether the ponds Mr. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
  On July 27, 2016, the Ohio Supreme Court issued its decision in Innkeeper Ministries, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 5:59 am by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court affirmed the district court’s judgment that there was no continuous movement of an unaltered item across state lines and insufficient evidence of interstate intent on the companies’ part (Mazzarella v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 10:53 am by Miriam Seifter
The question presented in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 11:38 am by Steven Boutwell
Stanton Contrary to courts across the pond, rare is the case in American courts where attorneys’ fees are awarded to the prevailing party. [read post]