Search for: "State v. Preis" Results 161 - 180 of 413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am by Ben Henriques, Corker Binning
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Mr Briggs is in a minimally conscious state and his family has requested that his life-sustaining treatment be withdrawn. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm by Jared Beck
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abishek Nagaraj: Good job of studying IP free zones v. struggles. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am by Edith Roberts
” In Prawfsblog, Jack Preis discusses Manuel v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Thomas filed a separate dissenting opinion in which Justice Alito joined (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Internet companies should not be able to override state law by contract when there’s a significant state policy interest in protecting state residents. [read post]