Search for: "State v. R. H." Results 161 - 180 of 4,722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2013, 7:10 am by Giles Peaker
Ms H appealed to the Court of Appeal.Ms H argued that in reaching its decision on whether she could pay the rent, Hounslow had failed to have regard to its duty under s.11 Children Act.The Court of Appeal found:Following ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4, a decision that affected the upbringing of a child had to be made with the well being of the child as a primary concern. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am by Eric Goldman
  (A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
In a very recent decision by the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 12:02 pm
In a very recent decision by the United States Supreme Court, in Berghuis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 9:29 pm
United States Case: An Overview of the Epochal Judgments Daniel Müller, The Saga of the 1858 Treaty of Limits: The Cases Against Costa Rica Lawrence H. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:15 pm by Michael H. Neifach and Amy L. Peck
The complaint filed in California, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. the Departments of Homeland Security and Labor, et al., challenges both the Strengthening Wage Protections for the Temporary and Permanent Employment of Certain Aliens in the United States Rule and the Strengthening of the H-1B Nonimmigrant Visa Classification Rule. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:54 am
In two decisions from the Second Department last Tuesday (Hughes v Webb, 2007 NY Slip Op 04597 and Langhorne v County of Nassau, 2007 NY Slip Op 04602), the Court held that evidence of the "permanence" of particular injuries fall outside of the rule. [read post]