Search for: "State v. R. Hope" Results 161 - 180 of 5,397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2009, 5:40 pm by David M. Goldman
The decision to hear the case, which will be argued early next year, gives Second Amendment advocates across America hope that this fundamental freedom will not be infringed by unreasonable state and local laws. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am by INFORRM
  As we indicated in our previous comment, it is to be hoped that the appeal will proceed and that the award will be overturned. [read post]
Anti-abortion advocates hoped to amend the state constitution to stipulate that “the constitution of the state of Kansas does not require government funding of abortion and does not create or secure a right to abortion. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a  ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
R (G) v Southwark [2009] UKHL 26 was the appeal to the House of Lords of this Court of Appeal judgment. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:13 am
Ron DeSantis (R)... said in a recent statement that the state would 'work to expand pro-life protections' but did not chart out specifics.... [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:54 pm by Matthew Flinn
That was a misreading of the judgment of Lord Hope in Secretary of State for Justice v James [2009] UKHL 22, in which the court decided that Article 5(4) did not require the Secretary of State to assist a detainee in putting forward his best possible case for release at parole hearings. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:01 am by Stewart Baker
 That is, they hoped that  state authorities could use their enforcement power to blunt or redirect the thrust of federal policy. [read post]