Search for: "State v. R. Hope"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2009, 5:40 pm
The decision to hear the case, which will be argued early next year, gives Second Amendment advocates across America hope that this fundamental freedom will not be infringed by unreasonable state and local laws. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:36 pm
In Rivera v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:05 pm
In Beaty v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am
As we indicated in our previous comment, it is to be hoped that the appeal will proceed and that the award will be overturned. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:21 pm
(Orin Kerr) A petition for rehearing was recently filed in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
R. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:20 am
In Myers v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:09 pm
R. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 9:15 am
Anti-abortion advocates hoped to amend the state constitution to stipulate that “the constitution of the state of Kansas does not require government funding of abortion and does not create or secure a right to abortion. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:02 pm
The court just ruled in Missouri v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 6:44 am
In Benitez v Hernandez, 2017 WL 1404317 (D. [read post]
20 May 2009, 4:28 pm
R (G) v Southwark [2009] UKHL 26 was the appeal to the House of Lords of this Court of Appeal judgment. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:11 am
In State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:58 am
R. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:25 am
The case is Martinez v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:13 am
Ron DeSantis (R)... said in a recent statement that the state would 'work to expand pro-life protections' but did not chart out specifics.... [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:54 pm
That was a misreading of the judgment of Lord Hope in Secretary of State for Justice v James [2009] UKHL 22, in which the court decided that Article 5(4) did not require the Secretary of State to assist a detainee in putting forward his best possible case for release at parole hearings. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:01 am
That is, they hoped that state authorities could use their enforcement power to blunt or redirect the thrust of federal policy. [read post]
