Search for: "State v. REC" Results 161 - 180 of 232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In 2002, the Committee of Ministers adopted a detailed “Recommendation on Access to Official Documents” (Rec(2002)002) which invoked Articles 8 and 10 and recommended that “Member States should guarantee the right of everyone to have access, on request, to official documents. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:41 am
Leisure Time Rec., Inc., 192 Misc. 2d 553, 558 (N.Y. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:49 am by Adrian Lurssen
Sutherland in Upstart Business Journal/Portfolio.com: Kickstarter Turns Crowdfunding Up To 11 Patton Boggs in Revolution Analytics’ Revolutions: EU court’s SAS ruling conflicts with Oracle v Google McDermott Will & Emery in WSJ’s Corruption Currents: High Tide: From Wal-Mart Testing Corporate Citizenship To Being Unfit For Command Reed Smith on Lenders 360: Why Do Lenders Disdain Bankruptcy Court? [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 7:07 pm
” It also states that “Category of the not a plugged nickle [sic] means get nothing… . [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:02 am by GuestPost
Furthermore, the GRAG draws support for the ECHR decision of Parry v UK to argue that it is within the margin of appreciation afforded to states on this issue to exclude married applicants from recognition. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:38 pm by INFORRM
In 2002, the Committee of Ministers adopted a detailed “Recommendation on Access to Official Documents” (Rec(2002)002) which invoked Articles 8 and 10 and recommended that “Member States should guarantee the right of everyone to have access, on request, to official documents. [read post]