Search for: "State v. Romero"
Results 161 - 180
of 268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2016, 9:37 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:37 am
State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 5:12 am
When the officers arrived there, they spoke with Kennedy’s mother, Lisa Romero, who refused to consent to let the officers search the house. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm
A request for review of the appellate court’s decision was filed with the Supreme Court of California on March 9, 2010.New Jersey Federal District Court: Worker Not Entitled to New Trial on Damages for Pain and SufferingIn Romero v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
Super. 17, 32 (1990) (quoting Romero v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 11:27 am
In Romero v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:57 pm
PeerJ Preprints 5:e3100v1 doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3100v1 , peerj.com/preprints/3100v1/ Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, Farley A, West J, Haustein S. (2017) The State of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:20 am
Romero and Karen Denise Bradley. 34 University of Dayton Law Review 1-46 (2008). [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 4:33 pm
(See Arguelles-Romero v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
As discussed in Romero v. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 9:18 am
Ed. 1254 (1953); Romero v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:27 am
Romero, 749 F.3d 900 (U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Deere & Co., 6 F.3d 497, 508 n.16 (8th Cir. 1993) (applying Iowa law); Romero v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Deere & Co., 6 F.3d 497, 508 n.16 (8th Cir. 1993) (applying Iowa law); Romero v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Deere & Co., 6 F.3d 497, 508 n.16 (8th Cir. 1993) (applying Iowa law); Romero v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Deere & Co., 6 F.3d 497, 508 n.16 (8th Cir. 1993) (applying Iowa law); Romero v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 6:18 am
Romero, 78 NY2d 355 [1991].) [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Citing to the recent decision in Brown v. [read post]