Search for: "State v. Scott-Herring" Results 161 - 180 of 2,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  This process of judicial nullification culminated in Plessy v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 9:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
As for object lessons, Quinta engaged in a bit of self-promotion over her recent Atlantic piece on the forthcoming Supreme Court case Moore v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:08 am by Karina Lytvynska
In the United States, the debates on an artist’s fair use defense have been simmering catalyzed by the famous the case, Prince v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am by William Appleton
Department of State’s Nov. 17 filing in Cengiz et al v. bin Salman et al stating that the department recognizes Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s sovereign immunity as a sitting head of state. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 5:56 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Then, when the Supreme Court effectively confirmed that CIA black sites were unlawful in 2006 by ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 11:42 am by Robert George
The Supreme Court has, finally, relegated a tragic error to the ash heap of history alongside such similarly unjust and ignominious decisions as Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:01 am by Steven Cohen
  The court went to on state that if Moore would like, he can cross examine her during her testimony. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
She later deleted her account (likely after her attorney regained consciousness). [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  In response to the debate the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice (Gareth Johnson) told the House that these matters would be dealt with in legislation which, he said, was being drafted. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 9:04 pm by Eric W. Orts
The first instance of the Court’s misfiring came in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
The linchpin of Mostyn J’s conclusions in his recent series of judgments is (a) that the correct interpretation of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 is that financial remedy proceedings which are not concerned with child maintenance are and should always have been heard in public or as if in public, and (b) that, even if this is not right, the 2009 rule change which admitted accredited journalists to hearings of financial remedy proceedings rendered them public hearings. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
” Perales won League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Henrichsen, Henrichsen Law Group, PLLC, Jacksonville, FL, Victoria Blanche Kroell, Cole Scott & Kissane, PA, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. [read post]