Search for: "State v. Servantes" Results 161 - 180 of 1,171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court gets ready to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
United States A new privacy bill is pending in Massachusetts would be the most revolutionary data-privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court will hear oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 4:22 am by SHG
He began, as so many do these days, with the Supreme Court’s shadow docket decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 4:33 pm by Kevin Sheerin
Have you taken a civil service exam to become a police officer, fire fighter, corrections officer, sanitation worker or other civil servant for New York City or New York State and received a letter stating you are disqualified for medical reasons? [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
As former President Trump continues to promote the false notion that the 2020 White House race was tainted by fraud, there is mounting evidence his attacks are curdling the faith many Americans once had in their elections and taking a deep toll on the public servants who work to protect the vote. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Cotter, Nominal Damages—and Nominal Damages Workarounds—in Intellectual Property Law TransUnion v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am by admin
Tex. 2005) (Jack, J.)). [9] Mississippi Valley Silica Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” Drawing on their interviews with civil servants and political appointees, they find that the competing values of responsiveness and independence are, as a rule, reconciled “right inside the agency. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 6:46 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
It went on, stating that when courts have commented on an obligation to investigate prior to dismissal, “it is in a practical, cautionary sense rather than as a free-standing legal duty. [read post]