Search for: "State v. Shirk" Results 161 - 180 of 215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2010, 10:14 am by Christine Hurt
  State law oversight cases are not winners generally, and it's hard to point to a particular false statement or omission relating to broad business strategy. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm by David Skover
  Not only is the federal judiciary shirking its responsibility to expound on the meaning of the Constitution and federal laws, but it now allows the Executive to act functionally as the judge of its own cause in the national security context. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 12:35 pm by Steve Bainbridge
When directors shirk their duty to monitor management, stockholder interests are left unprotected. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I was reminded of all this by Francis Pileggi's post on a recent Delaware case, Hampshire Group, Limited v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:22 pm by cdw
Last week, the Supreme Court heard Magwood v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 9:12 am by Steve Hall
The Court's 4-3 ruling in Weis v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 5:27 am
The text follows: The business judgment rule pervades every aspect of state corporate law, from director negligence to self-dealing transactions to dismissal of shareholder litigation and so on. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
BLOOMBERG ON COURT DECISION ON STATE RENT LAWS "Today's decision [in Roberts v Tishman Speyer Props., L.P.] [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:07 am
  He cites the Brown v. [read post]