Search for: "State v. Shore"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,443
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2022, 7:30 am
Rickie Solinger is a historian, and the author of Pregnancy and Power: A History of Reproductive Politics in the United States (2007), Beggars and Choosers: How the Politics of Choice Shapes Adoption, Abortion and Welfare in the United States (2002), and Wake Up, Little Susie: Single Pregnancy and Race Before Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 8:57 am
Law.com reports on the opinion, Weinhoffer v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:30 am
Shore, SCOTUS allowed that in some circumstances, someone who was not a plaintiff in the initial case can t [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am
It grew more complex as an array of state and non-state actors took sides in Assad’s civil war and terrorist groups also began vying for territory and control. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 10:43 pm
Indeed, while reading the piece, I had flashbacks to NFIB v. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Aquilino asserted that the three islands function to “expand the offensive capability of the [People’s Republic of China] beyond their continental shores. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
He relegates to a single brief mention the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
This is precisely what happened with the state congressional district maps (for the state senate and state assembly lines). [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm
This is precisely what happened with the state congressional district maps (for the state senate and state assembly lines). [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 2:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:00 am
Gavlin v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 7:25 am
First, demonstrating widespread reliance on abortion, including by women with the abortion privilege, is crucial to the stare decisis argument to uphold Roe v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:27 pm
Zapata Off–Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 (1972). [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 2:41 am
Republican State Comm. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm
" A prior panel precedent is "undermined," we explained in United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 8:06 am
Finger v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
In Bishop of Charleston v. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
It is important for states to shore up reproductive rights so that CPCs are not more accessible than genuine reproductive health care—especially now that the Court is poised to overrule or gut Roe v. [read post]
