Search for: "State v. Spears"
Results 161 - 180
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2016, 2:08 pm
The most recent such case, United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:09 pm
Fairbanks North Star Borough v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 11:21 am
Quinn and Friedrichs v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 3:02 pm
The recent decision submitted by the OCC, Robinson and Spears v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
They were in possession of 30,000 untaxed cigarettes and $63,000 in cash, and they are just the tip of the spear.[2] The inbound flow of cigarettes, not appropriately taxed by New York, is estimated to cost the state $1.2 billion. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 12:41 pm
Recently, in Luiken v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 9:52 am
Spear, 520 U.S. 154 (1997). [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 5:04 pm
Building on its 2016 decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 3:17 am
Spears, CCH Privacy Law in Marketing ¶60,380. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 2:18 am
Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 162 (1997); Cetacean Cmty. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
Spears, 314 N.C. 319, 322 (1985) (considering similar scheme under Fair Sentencing Act); see also State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
"[J]udicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited" (Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
"[J]udicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited" (Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 6:02 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 7:30 am
The summary reversal issued in Spears v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 2:33 pm
The government faced an uphill battle in Wednesday’s argument in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:08 pm
That’s because on December 20, 2011, the Ninth Circuit held in UMG v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:07 pm
Warth v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:55 am
Edward & Marjorie Austin Unitrust v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
This may require steps such as (i) being prepared to investigate the nature and scope of the attack, (ii) ensuring that the attackers are not still present in its systems, (iii) determining whether notification is required under applicable state law to individuals and state agencies, (iv) reporting to the IRS at phishing@irs.gov and the Internet Crime Complaint Center of the FBI, and (v) helping employees who may have questions about rectifying their tax returns. [read post]
