Search for: "State v. Stevens "
Results 161 - 180
of 4,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Apixaban (1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-7-oxo-6-[4-(2-oxopiperidin-1-yl)phenyl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyridin-3-carbamide) The patent is unopposed. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
[54] New Classic Cases – Falstaff The new Guidelines cite U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:51 am
., et al. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of DeNigris v Smithtown Cent. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 7:36 am
In the end, however, they came on board, along with several state governments. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm
It would be useful to borrow from Steven Chong, J’s reading of the doctrine in BCY v BCZ, which is also a case of the Singapore High Court that applied the composite approach of Sulamerica. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
” Shea v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:55 am
Rev. 1185 (2023)) on SSRN> Here is the abstract: A huge number of tort suits in the United States are captioned Plaintiff & Spouse v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am
From L.W. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
RYLEWICZ, CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ALBANY (STEVEN M. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
RYLEWICZ, CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, INC., ALBANY (STEVEN M. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 pm
Cf Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:08 am
ADDED: Pildes declines to mention Bush v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
The United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
Justice Scalia predicted as much in his Lawrence dissent: This reasoning leaves on pretty shaky grounds state laws limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples. [read post]