Search for: "State v. Vos"
Results 161 - 180
of 200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2012, 2:30 am
It is entirely plausible that commercial expression could be protected under this right and we have seen this in cases like Print Media South Africa and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Another which dealt with an amendment to the Films and Publications Act which established criteria for ratings for sexual and other content. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
On Thursday 19 January 2012 there will be a pre-trial review before Mr Justice Vos in the phone hacking litigation the trial of which is due to begin on 13 February 2012. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
Mr Justice Vos announced five phone hacking “lead cases”. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
I agree with the judgment of Vos J. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
On Monday 28 and Tuesday 29 November 2011 the Court of Appeal (Lord Judge LCJ, Lord Neuberger MR and Maurice Kay LJ) heard the appeals in Phillips v NGN and Coogan v NGN against orders of Mr Justice Vos in phone hacking claims (see [2011] EWHC 349 (Ch)). [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
On Sunday, Guido Fawkes released a preview of Alastair Campbell’s evidence to the Inquiry, stating that he had acquired it by “legal means”. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
On 18 November 2011, the fifth Case Management Conference took place in the Voicemail Interception Litigation before Mr Justice Vos. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:13 am
In the field of parody, specifically, eyes of consumers collectively rolled when EMI Publishing claimed copyright infringement over a Youtube video created and performed by a group of people who parodied RnB stars Alicia Keys and Jay-Z’s huge hit ‘New York (Empire State of Mind)' with the song ‘Newport (Ymerodraeth State of Mind)’ (for those readers unfamiliar with British geography, Newport is a town in south Wales). [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:20 am
” I’m not an expert on this area of law, but I do know that a district court recently upheld a similar law, in Genesee Scrap & Tin Baling Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
First, in Marley v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
In Girao v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:05 am
Well, states cannot bring actions for libel but individuals can and any member of the Bahrain government defamed in the Independent would, in theory, have a claim. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:53 pm
Most importantly, it must be questioned, whether the new Regulations contain overriding specifications regarding the classification of the liability of the falsus procurator that are binding for the Member States. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:21 pm
Gregor Vos of Klos Morel Vos & Schaap in the Netherlands said that the damages provisions were based on the Benelux Treaty on IP (BTIP) and the Dutch Civil Code (DCC) and were dealt with in full court proceedings. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am
On the same day, Mr Justice Vos will hear applications in the phone hacking cases of Hoppen v NGN and Miller v NGN. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 4:44 am
On Monday 28 March 2011, the “Guardian” also reported on the hearing the previous Friday before Mr Justice Vos in the case of Miller v NGN and Mulcaire and the retrieval of the lost email archive. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
All the 16 plus “phone hacking” actions will come back before Mr Justice Vos on 15 April 2011 for a Case Management Conference for directions on how the cases should proceed. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am
As a result, Mr Justice Vos had to consider the merits of the claims. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 1:38 am
Celní úrad Tabor) - the English abstract reads as follows: The dogma that claims of the State based on its penal, revenue or other public law are not enforceable abroad – a doctrine also known as the revenue rule – is more and more displaced by European instruments obliging the Member States to collect public law claims of their fellow Member States. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:26 am
In Zuid-Chemie v. [read post]
