Search for: "Stephens v. Does et al" Results 161 - 180 of 352
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
If Einstein, Darwin, Kelvin et al. can misfire, who is to say that a law professor is perfect? [read post]
9 May 2013, 10:59 am by Ronald Collins
There are other books on the Court with a primarily practice-oriented or theoretical focus (such as Stern & Gressman on the practice side as well as a book by Susan Low Bloch et al. on the more theoretical side). [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:27 am by Cormac Early
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:28 am by Ivan Cohen
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on April 15 in Association of Molecular Pathology et al. v Myriad, concerning whether human genes are patent-eligible subject matter. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 3:37 am
Bigler et al. published in the May/June 1977 edition of the European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:56 am by Dennis Crouch
Breyer et al., Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy 777 (6th ed. 2006) ("Implicit preclusion is rare."). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 10:23 am by Ron Coleman
This motion does not address the questionable merits of [Pearson's] claims. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 9:28 am by Steve Davies
Williams, in the lower court, found that the ESA “does not require the NMFS to consider financial impacts on third parties such as [Dow, et al.] in determining whether the buffers are economically feasible. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 8:29 pm by Kenan Farrell
Real Action Paintball Inc et al Court Case Number: 1:12-cv-00296-JVB-RBC File Date: Friday, August 31, 2012 Plaintiff: Advanced Tactical Ordnance Systems LLC Plaintiff Counsel: Stephen R. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Poppy Weston-Davies
The United States National Federation of Independent Business et al v Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was signed by President Obama in March 2010. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:47 am by Lyle Denniston
  Unless the state’s promise of equality actually also embraced a refund for those worse off, the differing outcomes for the taxpayers are not unconstitutional, the Court declared by a 6-3 vote in Armour, et al., v. [read post]