Search for: "Stephens v. Rose"
Results 161 - 180
of 216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
49% thought native ads were unpaid v. 12% for non-native; remainder unsure.What if we tweak the label? [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm
Stephen M. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:18 pm
They pointed to a case from the Northern District of California — Polarity, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am
Five Justices of the Court will hear the arguments and determine the question; Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones, Lord Sales, Lord Stephens, Lady Rose. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:23 pm
Rep. 6. [3] Id. at 7, 11. [4] Id. at 7. [5] Stephen Choi, et al., Cornerstone Research and New York University Pollack Center for Law & Business, SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries—Fiscal Year 2017 Update 3 (2017). [6] Id. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm
Rep. 6. [3] Id. at 7, 11. [4] Id. at 7. [5] Stephen Choi, et al., Cornerstone Research and New York University Pollack Center for Law & Business, SEC Enforcement Activity: Public Companies and Subsidiaries—Fiscal Year 2017 Update 3 (2017). [6] Id. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Stephen Buyer with insider trading, accusing him of abusing his role as a corporate consultant to exploit nonpublic information and collect more than $300,000 in illegal profits. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 4:25 pm
And Landau soon was confronted with further skepticism, this time from Justice Stephen G. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:58 am
The video game industry around the world and in Canada is booming. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
http://tinyurl.com/4avwrhj (Stephen Arnold) Judge Scheindlin Rules That Metadata is Integral Part of ESI, Admonishes Counsel for Failing to Meet and Confer Concerning Form of ESI Production - http://tinyurl.com/4ul9xmm (Jennifer Hradil) Gavel to Gavel: Pitfalls of Monitoring Social Media - http://tinyurl.com/6j3o8uz (Byrona Maule) Government Appeals and Seeks a Stay of Judge Scheindlin’s FOIA Order on Metadata in NDLON v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
The Amazing Panda Adventure - (1995) (Panda) (Stephen Land) 57. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 3:27 am
” (Compare the Delaware Chancery Court’s recent decision in Zutrau v Jansing, also a dissenting shareholder proceeding that came amidst a pending derivative action alleging corporate waste, in which, rather than awarding a percentage of excessive compensation as damages, the court directed normalizing adjustments to the appraiser’s discounted cash flow analysis.) [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:53 pm
Going back to the Court’s ruling in the case of Helvering v. [read post]
