Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice" Results 161 - 180 of 698
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 4:20 am by Heidi Meinzer
Complicating things is the fact that Justice Stevens, who owns a Florida beachfront apartment, was absent from the oral argument, making it possible that the Justices will not have the votes one way or the other to reach a majority opinion. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am by Amy Howe
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
 In the Department of Justice’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion in this case, it argued thatDr. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the justices ruled that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot  be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by Amy Howe
  Only the federal government, the Justice Department argued, can make immigration policy. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
  Justice Souter dissented, joined by Justices Ginsburg and Stevens. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Ronald Collins
There have been divergent applications of the theory in the same case, as exemplified by Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion and Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm by Anna Christensen
Nearly three decades later, Justices Scalia and O'Connor picked up the judicial takings theme in a dissent from the denial of certiorari in Stevens v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am by Adam Chandler
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am by Matt Sundquist
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes explores the possibility that President Obama would feel compelled to nominate a Protestant to the Court if Justice John Paul Stevens were to retire, leaving the Court with six Catholic and two Jewish Justices. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:00 am
Earlier this month, the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission had filed an amicus brief recommending that the Supreme Court deny certiorari. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Carpenter v. [read post]