Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 161 - 180
of 700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2007, 3:27 pm
Doar, which was filed on April 10, 2007 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
United States. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:20 am
Complicating things is the fact that Justice Stevens, who owns a Florida beachfront apartment, was absent from the oral argument, making it possible that the Justices will not have the votes one way or the other to reach a majority opinion. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps argues that Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2013 dissent in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
That amendment provides: “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
In the Department of Justice’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion in this case, it argued thatDr. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
United States, the justices ruled that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
Only the federal government, the Justice Department argued, can make immigration policy. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
Justice Souter dissented, joined by Justices Ginsburg and Stevens. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
There have been divergent applications of the theory in the same case, as exemplified by Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion and Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm
Nearly three decades later, Justices Scalia and O'Connor picked up the judicial takings theme in a dissent from the denial of certiorari in Stevens v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:57 am
United States, released earlier this month. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:29 am
In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes explores the possibility that President Obama would feel compelled to nominate a Protestant to the Court if Justice John Paul Stevens were to retire, leaving the Court with six Catholic and two Jewish Justices. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 8:00 am
Earlier this month, the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission had filed an amicus brief recommending that the Supreme Court deny certiorari. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Carpenter v. [read post]
