Search for: "Stills v. Superior Court of California"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2012, 6:02 pm
Superior Court (2012) 2012 Cal. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
Gupta v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 3:00 pm
Gentry v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
The California DUI Lawyers Association’s lawsuit, which was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court on August 1, 2014, is pending. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm
Today, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:33 pm
Superior Court, 97 Cal. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:23 am
A California Superior Court’s recent ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:42 pm
Still, many appellate opinions rendered by the California Court of Appeal are not published. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:38 am
Although the Ninth Circuit has made a U-turn, the California Supreme Court may still determine Dynamex applies retroactively. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:34 am
Superior Court (2004) 34 Cal.4th 319, 339.) [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Superior Court, 39 Cal.3d 740 (1985)). [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:03 pm
DauscherAs many of our readers know, the California Court of Appeals decided in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
In M.T. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:12 am
Superior Court, 96 Cal. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
Largent Today a California court issued the first published state court decision addressing whether the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility v Concepcion invalidates the California Supreme Court's decision in Gentry v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 8:35 am
The much-anticipated California Supreme Court’s decision in Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
Superior Court, supra, 190 Cal. [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:13 pm
However, as the court in General Commercial Packaging, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 832, 838-839.) [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 2:00 pm
The Court of Appeal affirmed, citing Berry v. [read post]