Search for: "Stone v. County" Results 161 - 180 of 584
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
One leading Supreme Court case from a quarter century ago involved an attempt by a county to calibrate the fees it charged (up to $1,000) to people who sought a (required) permit to hold large parades or rallies according to the costs the county would incur in ensuring safety and good order during the particular event. [read post]
1 May 2018, 5:33 am by Charles Sartain
Garza and a West Virginia federal court decision, Stone v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
"[3] (You can't get blood from a stone, but maybe from the stone's friends.) [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
 The facts of the case are as follows:Seven individual landowners (the “Landowners”) hold interests in approximately 74 acres of land in Washington County, Ohio. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 12:10 pm
 The facts of the case are as follows:Seven individual landowners (the “Landowners”) hold interests in approximately 74 acres of land in Washington County, Ohio. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:57 am by Michael Kimberly
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees than just the First Amend­ment. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am by Lorene Park
On November 21, a federal court in Minnesota also preliminarily enjoined the ban in Stone v. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Finally, a caterer was found liable for the death of a business invitee who was killed crossing a county highway after parking her car in a lot the caterer knew or should have known the invitee would use. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:40 pm by Josh Blackman
Out of necessity, the challengers will have to contend that the policy is subject to what amounts to a “forever taint,” as Supreme Court Justice David Souter labeled it in McCreary County v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Gluck, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney).Matthew Astore, Deputy Public Defender II, argued the cause for respondent (Zulima V. [read post]