Search for: "Street v. Second Court of Appeals" Results 161 - 180 of 2,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
  Says the Second Circuit here: Although the Supreme Court’s decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:15 am by Giles Peaker
And we continue to await Circuit Judge and Higher Court appeal decisions on all of this. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 8:15 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
At issue in this particular appeal is only the second count of the claim, which pertains to the driver personally. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am by Giles Peaker
Our post on Nzolameso v City of Westminster [2015] UKSC 22 will be along very shortly, but behind the headlines of the judgment (and it is a good judgment) is a whole history, even between the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court hearings. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 11:58 am by Patricia Salkin
Upper Delaware Hospitality Corp. v Town of Tusten Zoning Board of Appeals, 2024 WL 117275 (NYAD 3 Dept. 1/11/2024) [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:29 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
  By implication, this amounted to a monthly periodic tenancy in accordance with the decision in Street v Mountford [1985] AC 809. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals has rejected a district court false arrest judgment in favor of disabled veterans who operate vending carts on New York City sidewalks.The case is Crescenzi v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:11 pm by Maria Hook
The decision arose on an application to stay or dismiss the enforcement proceeding at the jurisdictional stage. [2] Altimo Holdings and Investment Ltd v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Ltd [2011] UKPC 7, [2012] 1 WLR 1804. [3] The judge noted that the House of Lords had rejected the argument that it should not recognize the courts of the German Democratic Republic (Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Rayner &  Keeler Ltd (No 2) [1967] 1 AC 853), and the Second Circuit Court… [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
   This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:15 am by Dean Freeman
Trial court issued a summary judgment in favor of city, but the  California Court of Appeals, Second Appellate District, Division Six, reversed. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:37 pm
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled "the FCC’s new policy sanctioning 'fleeting expletives' is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act for failing to articulate a reasoned basis for its change in policy. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
The Court of Appeal had already refused permission to appeal on this point some time ago in the case of Elias v Spencer (no relation!). [read post]