Search for: "Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. DOE, an individual" Results 161 - 180 of 180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2010, 6:31 am by INFORRM
“ The petition is discussed on the Hold the Front Page site and by the Press Gazette. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 8:28 am by Paul Bland
  It’s striking that ATTM asks the Court to begin with this assumption as though it were an uncontroversial and obvious abstract legal principle instead of a factual issue to be resolved on a case-by-case basis in light of actual admissible.2   In any event, if the Court limits its holding in Concepcion to the question presented, then whatever that holding is, it should not apply whenever class actions are necessary for the effective vindication of… [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
Those efforts were put on hold for several years due to Hurricane Katrina in 2005. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
Charges filed by Individuals and Factory Workers Laborers' Local 1357; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1), (3), and (5). [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Unlike Rule 23(b)(3), 23(b)(2) does not require that class members receive “opt-out” rights. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
: (IP ThinkTank), (further discussion from IAM and e^(ip)) Illusory world of trade secret protection – Discussion of S Schreter’s article ‘Inside entrepreneurship: Patent protection isn’t only option’: (IPBiz)   Global – Copyright Illegal art: (Patry Copyright Blog),     Events 1-3 June: ACC Europe 2008 annual conference ‘Becoming a global legal manager: Developing the skills you will need to… [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Order to transfer myspace.co.uk to MySpace overturned: (Out-Law), (IMPACT), New branding scheme for Ethiopian coffees: (Afro-IP), (IP finance), (IPKat), USPTO to appeal Tafas/GSK v Dudas: (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (PLI), (Patent Baristas), (Managing Intellectual Property), (IP Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Ladas & Parry),… [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty)… [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:41 pm
If the price of grease does rise, he pockets the difference between what he agreed to pay on the strike date and the market price at which he may now sell the oleaginous substance. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
Beck, 487 U.S. 735 (1988), the Supreme Court found that Section 8(a)(3) does not permit a union to spend funds collected from objecting non-members under a union security provision on activities unrelated to collective bargaining, contract administration,  or grievance adjustment. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Law Judge Eleanor MacDonald issued her decision May 3, 2002. *** Aztar Indiana Gaming Co., LLC d/b/a Casino Aztar (25-RC-10335; 349 NLRB No. 59) Evansville, IN March 23, 2007. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
Law Judge Benjamin Schlesinger issued his decision May 10, 2005. *** ATC, LLC d/b/a ATC of Nevada (28-CA-20076, 20197; 348 NLRB No. 43) Las Vegas, NV Sept. 29, 2006. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board ordered that the Respondent make the affected individuals whole for any lost earnings and other benefits resulting from their unlawful layoffs. [read post]