Search for: "Sullivan v Mains" Results 161 - 180 of 219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
It is not a new form of liability or speech compulsion, such as the right of reply struck down in Miami Herald Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am by Peter Mahler
I’ve previously featured on this blog several illustrative fixed price buy-sell lawsuits precipitated by stale or absent certificates of value, including Sullivan v Troser Management, Nimkoff v Central Park Plaza Associates, and DeMatteo v DeMatteo Salvage Co. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Stateside, the first three chapters examine how the fundamental US/UK differences in attitude towards freedom of speech came about – principally with the bell tolling for reputational rights in 1964 when the case of New York Times v Sullivan (an index stalwart for practitioners) decided that, where allegations concern official conduct, a public official cannot bring a defamation claim unless able to show ‘actual malice’: the defamation law equivalent of the… [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Andrew Hamm
Ginsburg borrowed from her dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 6:17 am
., on Friday, July 5, 2019 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Dual-class stock, ESG, Institutional Investors, Lyft, Shareholder voting, Uber Director Independence and Oversight Obligation in Marchand v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[11] But that's not a problem here: The main risk of reputational damage comes when people simply search for R.R.'s name, or ask about what he had been accused of, [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
  For that reason, since February 2014, almost every case that the Court has granted has been relisted at least once, with the main exception being cases granted out of the late-September “Long Conference” (presumably because during the summer, the Court has enough extra time that the relist isn’t necessary). [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Coordinators have assisted over 300 families this year, and have a presence with Title V, P & A, CHIP, the Child Find Policy and Practice Committee, the Governor's Chronic Illness Task Force and the Family Resource Connection (devoted to early childhood issues)! [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 3:52 am by Ron Coleman
You won’t find “bridging the gap” as a factor listed in Seventh Circuit cases such as Sullivan v. [read post]