Search for: "Sullivan v. D "
Results 161 - 180
of 952
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 5:25 pm
Taylor Arnett, No. 112,572 (Wyandotte)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Samuel D. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
On April 3, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) issued a policy statement regarding what constitutes an “abusive” act or practice (the “Policy Statement”).[1] The Policy Statement outlines the CFPB’s approach to analyzing whether an act or practice may be abusive and provides examples, which the Policy Statement also notes may be used by state attorneys general or other agencies that are authorized to enforce the prohibition on… [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
Sullivan Co. [read post]
20 Mar 2021, 7:57 am
Now, I'd like to see the news told straight, without bias one way or the other, but if narratives are chosen, why are they chosen? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Sullivan, and the Jehovah’s Witness pamphleteers in Lovell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
These include the following, among other indicators: (i) the acquirer is “well-capitalized” and the resulting institution will be “well-capitalized”; (ii) the acquirer has a Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”) rating of Outstanding or Satisfactory; (iii) the resulting institution will have total assets of less than $50 billion; (iv) the acquirer has composite, management and consumer compliance ratings of 1 or 2; and (v) the acquirer has… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 1:28 am
MAZZARELLI, J.P., MARLOW, SULLIVAN, GONZALEZ, ... [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
” Mazer v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:43 pm
Lynn Winmill had relied incorrectly on a 1989 Supreme Court decision that dealt with “a very unusual type of social security case” (Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:39 am
Supreme Court case called Rinaldi v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 3:43 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:24 am
In Gonzalez v D & S Zaffuto Joint Venture, 271 AD2d 356 [2000], the First Department held that "no private right of action exists to enforce contracts requiring payment of Federal Davis-Bacon Act . . . prevailing wages. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:33 pm
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 9:34 pm
Seth D. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:41 am
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Concluding that provision was ambiguous, the court ruled that it did not constitute an “explicit” provision barring such layoffs. __________________ Brian D. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 9:55 am
Cokus v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:32 am
By Terry D. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:06 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 280 (1964)). [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:39 pm
Los 13 Abogados Litigantes de Dougherty, Leventhal & Price, LLP están ocupados representando a las víctimas de accidentes relacionados a la Industria de la Perforación de Gas a través de NEPA incluyendo los Condados de Bradford, Susquehanna, Tioga, Wyoming, y Sullivan. [read post]
