Search for: "Sullivan v. Texas" Results 161 - 180 of 292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Sullivan, 559 N.W.2d 740, 747 (Neb. 1997) (dictum), followed in Nolan v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Sullivan, 372, 327 U.S. 58, 70 (1963) and Organization for a Better Austin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
He fills the vacancy created by the resignation of Judge Grant V. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 12:04 am
Sullivan - 1      -Former dean of Stanford Law School, current professor at SLS. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Kara Goad and Elizabeth Sullivan preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:17 am by Susan Brenner
Green, __ N.Y.S.2d __, 2011 WL 2320239 (New York County Court – Sullivan County 2011). [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Jeff Kosseff
And two Supreme Court justices have called for the court to reconsider New York Times v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm by John Elwood
While both Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch have criticized Sullivan and called for it to be overruled, it seems unlikely that the court will grant review; just last term, the court relied on Sullivan in holding that threats could not be prosecuted under the First Amendment absent proof they were made in reckless disregard that the listener would be placed in fear. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:11 pm by John Floyd
Sullivan (provided broad protections for the press in libel actions brought by a public official, and  Gideon v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 3:58 am by Lorene Park
In the age column, a 60-year-old project manager at a Pennsylvania dental school, who was replaced by the dean’s 30-year-old research assistant when his job was eliminated and a new position encompassing his duties was created, was allowed to go to trial on his ADEA and state law age discrimination claims (Sullivan v Temple University, March 5, 2013, No. 11-7305). [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 1:37 pm
By denying Texas residents the information that consistent optometric services were available, the Texas law interfered with truthful commercial speech. [read post]