Search for: "Superior Ins. Co. v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 732
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2017, 10:11 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
   Thus, for 13 years, federal and state trial courts in Pennsylvania have applied the legal standard announced by the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s “preeminent ruling” in Terletsky v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 8:24 pm
There are a couple of things that may facially appear to mean something but that actually mean nothing of the sort.So, for example, in this case, we see Justice Richli pointedly refer to Section 3523 of the California Civil Code, which states: "For every wrong there is a remedy. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
”  The Court noted that the Release did not identify the UIM insurer directly.In rejecting the carrier's position , the District Court relied, in part, upon the Pennsylvania Superior Court's decision in Sparler v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:11 am
Superior Court, 115 Cal.App. 4th 874 (California Court of Appeals 2004).In 2002, we held in TBG Ins. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:36 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Tort Talkers may recall that, previously, the Pennsylvania Superior Court ruled on an identical venue selection clause in an insurance policy in the case of O’Hara v. [read post]