Search for: "Superior Oil Co. v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This note compares the reasoning of the English court in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
This note compares the reasoning of the English court in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm by The Legal Blog
The doctrine of judicial precedents broadly speaking implies that court is bound to follow decisions of its higher courts but may not be bound by decisions of courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction.A ruling of a superior court is a binding law. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:53 am by Maxwell Kennerly
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has applied the Supreme 222*222 Court's standing rule to the post-1996 catch-all provision, see Debbs v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
 BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:52 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Thus the wrongful death statute is intended to compensate the pecuniary losses first and foremost of the decedent's immediate family, that is, his or her spouse and children, those most likely to have expected support and to have suffered pecuniary injury (see generally, Loucks v Standard Oil Co. of N.Y., 224 NY 99, 104 [1918] [Cardozo, J.]). [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by Don Cruse
American Home Assurance Co. and Illinois National Insurance Co. v. [read post]