Search for: "Supreme People's Court Monitor" Results 161 - 180 of 1,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2022, 10:16 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Philadelphia), whether as to the result (in Hobby Lobby) or the reasoning (in Fulton), can make people think that religious exemption claims always so divide the Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 4:00 pm
A battle is raging in the nation's courts right now over the contents of your pocket. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 12:29 pm
In many states, people subject to foreclosure have gone to court to argue that the bank's paperwork is not in order, and one argument they can make is that the interest was not properly recorded on the title, or "perfected. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:56 am
The Supreme Court must now answer the questions: (1) Whether the warrantless use of a tracking device on petitioner's vehicle to monitor its movements on public streets violated the Fourth Amendment; and (2) whether the government violated respondent's Fourth Amendment rights by installing the GPS tracking device on his vehicle without a valid warrant and without his consent. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
But before the Court of Appeals took up the issue as to whether the condition violated the standard the California Supreme Court articulated in People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 6:13 pm
Moreover, government officials argued that they could not follow the procedures already set up for intelligence-gathering with the FISA Court's approval, because that process was too slow and too limited to get at the wide sweep of monitoring the government felt a need to do. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
" If the state's high court rules that local governments don't have the authority to regulate medical marijuana cultivation or distribution, it could derail the entire industry. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Supreme Court added,Despite the plaintiff's contention that he was "informed" that The Health Center may have violated the Education Law or the Rules of the Board of Regents, he fails to state that this was his own reasonable belief, as required by Labor Law § 741(2)(a). [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 7:11 pm by Martin Husovec
Peers equated Digital Rights Ireland decision with civil rights judgments of the US Supreme Court on the desegregation of schools (Brown) or criminal suspects’ rights (Miranda). [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Evelyn Douek
” Or in the language of social media:  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Zuckerberg did not repeat the thought-bubble he floated earlier this month that a “Supreme Court” of Facebook might be set up to make calls on contested moderation decisions. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 5:47 am by Zoe Tillman
Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United made "super PAC" donations like Adelson's possible. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 2:44 pm
The story underlies Jack's claim that the leaders of the Republican Party don't really want the Supreme Court to overturn Roe, because once that happens, they will be out of the job. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:55 am
" law.com's Tony Mauro reports that "Supreme Court Hears Arguments in D.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:12 am
The California Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeal’s decision. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:23 am
  `Following a defendant's conviction of a crime, the sentencing court may choose among a variety of dispositional options. [read post]