Search for: "T. B.1."
Results 161 - 180
of 29,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Enlarged Board of Appeal decisions G 9/92 [12] and G 4/93 [1]). [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:25 am
(b) In view of the information disclosed in paragraphs [0019] and [0020] of the description, it was clear that citric acid could be present in the formulation of claim 1 both as a chelator and as a solubilising agent. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:36 am
European patent No. 1 616 973 relates to a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet.II. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
When Melanie B. explain [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 2:35 pm
Subdivision (b)(1)(B) clearly specifies that its resentencing relief is limited to cases in which “[t]he person was sentenced prior to January 1, 2015. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:20 pm
In the case of any dispute as to the extent of the relevant common general knowledge this, like any other fact in contention, has to be proved, for instance by documentary or oral evidence (T 939/92, OJ 1996, 309, see also T 766/91, T 1242/04, OJ 2007, 421; T 537/90, T 329/04 and T 811/06). [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
A further repetition of the process of Example 8 performed by the appellant, the experimental details of which were provided in Annex B of letter dated 8 March 2013, confirmed said conclusion. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
J 10/07, T 1366/04, T 1279/05). [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:14 am
A bathroom cleaning composition which comprises by weight:(a) 0.1 % t 10% of a chlorine bleach compound;(b) 0.1 % to 3% of an alkali metal silicate;(c) 0.25% to 5% of a phosphate builder salt which is sodium tripolyphosphate; and(d) the balance being water,wherein the bathroom cleaning composition further includes(e) an amine oxide surfactant,and has a pH of at least 9 to 14. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
Therefore, reimbursement under R 103(1)(b) (point (iii) above) is not an option either.When a situation does not correspond to R 103(1)(b), the (full or partial) reimbursement of the appeal fee cannot be triggered by a withdrawal of the appeal ( R 103(1)(b) e contrario; T 372/99, T 1142/04 ; T 1216/04).[7] Reimbursement of fees is also ordered when there has been a payment without legal justification (ohne … [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
In T 1981/12 the Board considered in detail the background of the rule. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read:A skin cleansing composition comprising (A) 3 to 80 wt.% of an oil component, (B) 1 to 45 wt.% of a hydrophilic nonionic surfactant, having an HLB value of more than 8 and having a hydrophobic group with 8 or more carbon atoms, (C) 1 to 45 wt.% of a lipophilic amphiphile, selected from nonionic surfactants having an HLB value of 8 or less, fatty alcohols having 8 to 25 carbon atoms, fatty acids having 8 to 25… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 9:59 am
The clock starts ticking again, but 403(b) plan sponsors aren’t home free. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm
In the present case, as regards criteria 1 and 2, the board comments as follows: (a) the open-ended range “> 1” defined by [the opponent] is unquestionably broad in comparison to the narrow range “2 to 12” defined in claim 1 at issue; (b) the upper (infinite) limit of the range “>1” is far away from the upper limit “12” of the range “2 to 12” defined in claim 1 at issue; (c) the… [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 10:23 am
The Appellant (Proprietor of the Patent) lodged an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division revoking European patent No. 1 648 534.II. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
"(b) First auxiliary requestClaim 1 as in the main request amended to specify at the end of the claim that (emphasis added by the board to indicate added text):"...to stir tea leaves, andwherein the time length of step b) is at least 5 seconds, preferably at most 50 seconds. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
In such a situation the introduction of this ground for opposition can result from the fact that the reasons for the decision contain substantiated statements regarding that matter.[2.4] In point 3.3 of its decision the OD refers, in an unambiguous and sufficient way, to the legal and factual framework of the ground for opposition according to which the skilled person can “can carry out” (thereby implicitly mentioning [the German version of] A 100(b)) a waterstop device… [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 9:03 am
T 1079/08, Gründe 4; T 2001/12, Gründe 3). [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Bei Verwendung der Emulsion des Beispiels 1 wurde hierdurch ein Joghurt mit einer Farbintensität b von 32 erhalten, während bei Verwendung der Vergleichsemulsion nur eine Intensität b von 29 erreicht wurde. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:18 pm
a) twice – 2 b) never +1 c) in jail -5 2. [read post]
