Search for: "THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ex rel"
Results 161 - 180
of 245
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
District of Columbia: D.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
Dept. of Commerce, Case 1:18-cv-02921 (SDNY, Filed 15 January 2019), a federal district court determined that the Secretary of Commerce unlawfully exercised what discretionary authority the law allowed in the ways he went about directing the insertion of the citizenship question that unlawfully annoyed some stakeholders and threatened others, in part because the decision was not "reasonable and reasonably explained. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
Review of the Effects of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act on Third Party Participation Applicants
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
James G. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 2:50 am
Best Price Stacking We previously blogged about the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States Ex Rel. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Note that this is a relatively rare direct appeal from a three-judge district court because it is a congressional redistricting case; more on that later. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:36 am
The first case Charles Hamilton Houston argued in 1938 [State of Missouri ex rel. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
I should note this lawsuit is sometimes referred to, mostly by me, as Ex rel. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
The Supreme Court's prior opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
Both District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
” In their petitions, Nick Feliciano, Evan Nordby, and Charles Flynn – supported by the congressional sponsors of the legislation, veteran advocacy groups, and a group of 20 states and the District of Columbia – say that the Federal Circuit’s reading is atextual and shortchanges veterans who can’t plan for their families during their deployments when they’re unsure whether their service will be counted. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Barron ex rel. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
District of Columbia: D.C. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
The district court held that E.M.D. had failed to prove the exemption applied by “clear and convincing evidence,” and the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2024, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (2007) (see denial of rehearing en banc). [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
District of ColumbiaInformal interviews are allowed in the District of Columbia. [read post]
