Search for: "THOMAS V. HOLDER"
Results 161 - 180
of 947
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2008, 3:16 am
Schrock v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
By setting the trigger at a level of 20%, the Barnes & Noble board allowed a group of say, six 3% holders or nine 2% holders, to join together and pool expenses. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:07 pm
("Quanta v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:26 am
Holder urging the Supreme Court to grant certiorari. [read post]
21 May 2021, 7:31 am
Conceal Carry, held Administrative Trademark Judge Christopher Larkin of the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board, joined by Judges Linda Kuczma and Thomas Shaw (Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 4:30 am
Fund v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Thomas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:05 am
Thomas Hull, D2010-1171 (WIPO September 16, 2010). [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:43 am
Holder. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:43 am
Expense Bd. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:51 pm
Holder, 557 U. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 2:53 pm
In what could be termed a sequel to the Supreme Court's 1972 decision in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
"Reining in Remedies in Patent Litigation: Three (Increasingly Immodest) Proposals" proposes that injunctions be unavailable over FRAND-pledged SEPs, advocates apportionment of the disgorgement of an infringer's profits that a design patent holder can seek (this approach would have taken care of a substantial part of the damages issue in Apple v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:38 pm
Huawei v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Holder, the challenge to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm
Thomas No. 10-1001: Martinez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 5:17 am
Nov. 30, 2010); Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
Holder [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 7:14 pm
That’s what Western District Judge Thomas Zilly found in his August 7 order on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment in Experience Hendrix, LLC v. [read post]