Search for: "Taylor v. Board of Education" Results 161 - 180 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2020, 5:58 am
Rubinfeld (NYU), on Friday, July 3, 2020 Tags: Asset management, Common ownership, Firm performance, Index funds, Institutional Investors, Ownership An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Decision in Liu v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:55 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Mark Walsh for Education Week, while at Balkinization Marty Lederman focuses on what he describes as “one important part of the Board’s application to the Court–namely, its conspicuous failure to explain how the district court’s injunction will harm the Board, or anyone else. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:27 pm by Gail Heriot and John Eastman
Board of Education (1954), two historic cases in the struggle against racial segregation. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:23 pm by Mark Graber
Board of Education (1954), which was also based on the independent judicial authority to interpret the Fourteenth Amendment Blackmon and Tillman would have the courts abjure. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:01 am
Negotiating General Municipal Law Section 207-a procedures City of Syracuse v Public Employment Relations Board, 279 AD2d 98 Two firefighters employed by the City were injured in the line of duty and began receiving salaries and benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law [GML] Section 207-a. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
Board of Education:  Elizabeth and Waties Waring’s Campaign (2023). 33. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
See, for example, Arland v Taylor, [1955] OR 131 (CA); R v Cinous, [2002] 2 SCR 3; and R v Lavallee, [1990] 1 SCR 852. 13. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 6:36 am by Marcia Coyle
” The final case in this trilogy is Oklahoma Statewide Charter School Board v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am by Roger Clegg
Jackson Board of Education, and Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
A court must uphold an administrative penalty unless it finds that it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness -- the Pell standard [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222].* §128-a of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law provides that “Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of law to the contrary, the authority shall promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to provide that it shall not be… [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
Whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board may construe claims in an issued patent according to their broadest reasonable interpretation rather than their plain and ordinary meaning; and (2) whether the court of appeals erred in holding that, even if the Board exceeds its statutory authority in instituting an IPR proceeding, the Board’s decision whether to institute an IPR proceeding… [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
” Individuals are sometimes under the impression that designating a position as “permanent” or “temporary” for budgetary purposes has an impact on determining an employee’s rights under the Civil Service Law, the Education Law or a Taylor Law Agreement. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
” At the School Law Blog at Education Week (via How Appealing), Mark Walsh covers the Court’s denial of cert. in Pontiac School District v. [read post]