Search for: "The Estate of John E. Long"
Results 161 - 180
of 390
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
This appeal was successfully handled by Monahan Law Group attorney John Whitcomb. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:51 am
E. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Here’s one example:[W]e conclude that a person acts in an intentional disregard of the rights of the plaintiff if the person acts with a purpose to disregard the plaintiff's rights, or is aware that his or her acts are substantially certain to result in the plaintiff's rights being disregarded. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 7:37 am
John Humphrey Dr. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
” But Justice Alito says this “flatly contravenes” precedent, including the holding of Hoffman Estates v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
BRENDA LIRA, AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GUADALUPE QUESADA, DECEASED; from Bexar County; 4th Court of Appeals District (04-13-00112-CV, 407 SW3d 810, 06-26-13) ATTORNEY-FEE ARBITRATION CASE INFO (CONSOLIDATED INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL AND MANDAMUS PROCEEDING) No. 13-1026 ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 2:14 pm
If you wish to be placed on the e-newslist, simply e-mail me at jules.haas@verizon.net. [read post]
9 May 2015, 9:09 pm
E. [read post]
9 May 2015, 2:29 pm
E. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am
Opinions GENE E. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:25 am
” It didn’t take long for Jane and John to be identified publicly as Modern Family‘s Sofia Vergara and creator of the Onion Crunch, Nick Loeb. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm
Lehmann, 359 S.W.3d 620, 623 (Tex. 2011) (per curiam), reasonable diligence is an issue of fact, Estate of Stonecipher v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 9:10 am
Duke University representatives said they agreed to allow the Duke name to be used, as long as it was only used in connection with John Wayne. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
School of Law) Betsy Rosenblatt (Whittier Law School) Jennifer E. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm
Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., 755 F. 3d 496 (7th. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am
(Note: Historically, this clause has been a litigation flashpoint) b) Termination for unsatisfactory manuscript c) Termination for changed market conditions d) How is notice of acceptance or dissatisfaction given e) Good faith duty to edit… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am
Thus, the Conan Doyle Estate cannot use its expired copyrights to prevent sequels to the Sherlock Holmes stories, as long as derivative works still subject to copyright are not used. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 8:19 pm
E. [read post]
