Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Brooks" Results 161 - 180 of 666
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization symposium on Robert Post,  The Taft Court: Making Law for a Divided Nation, 1921–1930 (Cambridge University Press, 2024).Edward A. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:21 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The 19-year-old victim was on a hunting trip when he was trying to negotiate his way across a small brook. [read post]
10 May 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"Also in the Times is a review of Speak Now: Marriage Equality on Trial: The Story of Hollingsworth v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:26 am
http://www.nylj.com Subscription required for online access unless otherwise noted: KINGS COUNTYCriminal PracticeAnonymous Tip on Possession of a Handgun Did Not Justify Seizure of Suspect People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2021, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
Ancestry Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
Speaking of presidential elections, Mitt Romney has famously observed that corporations are people, too. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Collins v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 6:23 pm
In a recent Colorado case - People v Lorenzo Brooks - the defendant's conviction's conviction for failure to register as a sex offender was overturned because his out of state Texas conviction had no Colorado sex crime equivalent. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:54 pm
" [T]he due process protections required for a risk level classification proceeding are not as extensive as those required in a plenary criminal or civil trial' " (People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99, 105, lv denied 1 NY3d 502, quoting Doe v Pataki, 3 F Supp 2d 456, 470). [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Perry and David Harshbarger, Brookings Institution] Full Fifth Circuit should review ruling upholding Indian Child Welfare Act against constitutional challenge [Ilya Shapiro on Cato amicus brief seeking en banc reconsideration in Brackeen v. [read post]