Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Clements" Results 161 - 180 of 311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 4:28 am by Lorene Park
Judge Jolly wrote one dissent, joined by Judges Jones, Smith, DeMoss, Clement, and Owen, asserting that the EEOC failed to proffer a basis for inferring discriminatory intent based on the employee’s gender. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:40 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) A little over a year has passed since the Supreme Court’s momentous decision in NFIB v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm
 That's all very understandable.It's nonetheless unfortunate.In the old days -- i.e., several years ago -- there were no pedestrian crossings across the tracks in San Clemente, and people just crossed wherever they wanted. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am by Addie Rolnick
I have written elsewhere about how to make sense of the “racial v. political” dichotomy that that seems to trouble many people about Indian law. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
Answer: I’m sure there will be people who disagree, but the answer is “yes. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
Your Curmudgeon is currently in Quincy, Illinois, working with co-counsel to prepare for the upcoming trial, which starts next week, in the case of The Diocese of Quincy, et al. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 8:12 am by Venkat
StateLatest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:58 am by Venkat
State * Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]