Search for: "The People v. English"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,922
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2024, 6:16 am
USCIS, Sept. 4, 2024 - "This notice is to tell you about a proposed Settlement Agreement of a class action lawsuit, J.O.P. et al. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:09 pm
On 4 December 2019, the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) held a press conference at Wuzhen, Zhejiang, in conjunction with the publication of a significant white paper titled Chinese Courts and the Internet Judiciary (downloadable here, in Chinese and in English). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
Let’s talk about Friedrichs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:12 am
The case, Arizona v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 7:43 pm
and I’ll explain it in Plain English. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:13 am
On Thursday, in Sykes v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 10:21 am
Given that 658 people did not reach a settlement but were apparently left untroubled, Virgin Media argued that this was evidence that the Applicants in the present case were simply interested in setting up a money-making scheme, not suing anyone or seeking genuine redress. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm
Constitution should be taken from lay English of 1787, or from legal English. [read post]
14 May 2016, 1:01 am
On this day in history, Lord Mansfield of the King’s Bench in England issued a ruling in the case of Somerset v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:48 pm
The English version follows.Reviews Jade WhiteThe following commentaries are responses to A Looming Crisis for China’s Legal System, by Jerome A. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Armour v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am
The online English-language article was, however, read by at least 200 people in Canada. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
In its motion to dismiss in CREW et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:13 am
While Aerotel placed a large wedge between the EPO Board of Appeals and English courts, recent cases have been bridging the gap, particularly in the area of obviousness in non-software cases (namely, Conor v Angiotech and Actavis v Merck). [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who has not… [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 6:39 am
To use United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 8:08 am
Faust v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:18 am
Let’s talk about the argument in Plain English. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 2:54 am
More than 924,000 people speak Arabic at home, of whom more than 500,000 also speak English "very well" or better. [read post]
