Search for: "The Rachel v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Rev. 755–802 (1993); Larry Catá Backer, Tweaking Facts, Speaking Judgment: Judicial Transmogrification of Case Narrative as Jurisprudence in the United States and Britain, 6 S. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:53 am by Cody Poplin
But, as the battle for Tikrit ramps up, the Wall Street Journal reports that the United States is walking back its plan to retake Mosul in April. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am by Miriam Seifter
By defining the key statutory term “waters of the United States,” the rule determines, among other issues, which water bodies are subject to the act’s discharge limitations and permitting requirements. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 1:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
Laurence of San Francisco, a supervising state deputy attorney general,  for the state, and Rachel P. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:08 am by Peter Margulies
The Fiscal Year 2017 Intelligence Reauthorization Act would hamper the PCLOB’s performance of its watchdog role, by expressly confining PCLOB oversight to the “privacy and civil liberties of United States persons. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:46 am
Every year, students in the clinic work to protect the rights of women around the world and in the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:12 am by Sandy Levinson
  So now let’s turn to the subject of Article V amendments and the validity of continuing state ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, about which I have expressed doubts—and which is defended by at least two very able participants on this venue, with reference, especially in Rachel Frank’s interesting post, to lawyers like Walter Dellinger whom I esteem in the highest possible degree. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:51 am
In the 1990s, the Church of Scientology’s generated a string of cases in the United States, colloquially known as “Scientology versus the Internet” (referring to: Religious Technology Center v Netcom (1995); Religious Technology Center v F.A.C.T.Net Inc (1995); Religious Technonlogy Center v Lerma (1995)).To understand the significance of these cases, we must go back to an earlier dispute between the Church of Scientology and a former… [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Oakhurst Dairy et al, the United States Court of Appeals decided that the absence of an Oxford comma in a statute was the critical element of its decision. [read post]