Search for: "Thomas Meadows" Results 161 - 174 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2007, 4:49 pm
As Duke Law professor Thomas Metzloff correctly noted, "There was an accused, and the accused was the Duke lacrosse team-a defined group of people, identifiable and defined by Nifong in having them all give DNA samples. [read post]
  Most strikingly, surprise testimony by Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, revealed a level of personal involvement by Trump in the events leading up to the Capitol riot that was sufficient to change the mind of my notoriously cantankerous Lawfare colleague Alan Rozenshtein as to whether Trump’s speech on the Ellipse that day constituted criminal incitement. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:39 pm by Bexis
Last week we put up a post commenting on something that we thought was wrong with New Jersey law. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Pyett, No. 07-581Enforceability of collectively bargained arbitration clause(From SCOTUSwiki): Justice Thomas's majority opinion held that nothing in either the National Labor Relations Act, which controls collective bargaining agreements made on behalf of union members, or the ADEA forbids unions from mandating arbitration to resolve statutory discrimination claims. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Beyond Intractability
Reading Thomas Kochman’s Black and White Styles in Conflict greatly reinforced that conclusion.1 Kochman did not specifically apply his findings to the mediation process. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm by Tom Joscelyn
White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, Trump’s social media guru Dan Scavino and several attorneys were also in attendance. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lee sent texts to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am by Ryan Goodman
But to date only Justice Thomas has indicated an interest in revisiting the Court’s immunity decisions. [read post]