Search for: "Thomas v. Biggers"
Results 161 - 180
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 1:47 pm
Cost – A Case for Fixed-Fee, Unit-Based Pricing – http://bit.ly/L9FILJ (Marc Zamsky) eDiscovery Case Law: Judges Get Annoyed When Lawyers Don’t Play Nice – http://bit.ly/LDquTY (Jason Krause) eDiscovery Drama: Stranger Than Fiction – http://bit.ly/QuvHvw (Matt Miller) How Early Case Assessment Can Drive Effective Arbitrations – http://bit.ly/LytKhp (Julie Anne Halter, Bill Zoellner) How To Manage The Costs Of Big Data In eDiscovery – http://bit.ly/Quv4lL… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:24 am
”Second: no matter the result, Roberts had bigger fish to fry than health care: the commerce clause. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
Given the the decision in Michigan v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:33 pm
In Hnataik v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 2:21 pm
In Hnataik v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:44 am
That case is Douglas v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:31 am
Thomas C. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:55 am
It is no answer to point to cases like Brown v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:27 pm
Reilly v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
alp v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am
The first case was filed by Alan Alaburda against Thomas Jefferson School of Law , which I wrote about here. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am
Once granted, the patent has immense value, and is protected against all but the strongest invalidity challenges thanks to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Microsoft v. i4i last summer. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
In particular, Justice Alito points to Oliver v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Biggers, 409 U. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
For those who question whether anyone is prosecuted for this offense, see People v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
As is Thomas today. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
Google: Judge Appoints a Damages Expert In the Oracle v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Poisoned Flowers (Finding Superman in Cyberspace), Thomas C. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:56 pm
Some people think this case is bigger than Roe v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:30 am
” In other words, the court seems to understand the magnitude of the case — easily the most high-profile since Bush v. [read post]
