Search for: "Time, Inc. v. TIME INC." Results 161 - 180 of 35,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Justice Gorsuch, in a dissenting opinion joined by Justice Sotomayor, expressed strong disagreement with the majority’s interpretation of Section 315(b) as “another step down the road of ceding core judicial powers to agency officials and leaving the disposition of private rights and liberties to bureaucratic mercy” (Thryv, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Last Friday, March 21, 2008, the Supreme Court gave itself an extension of time, through April 28, 2008, to grant or deny review in Bell v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:41 am by Ted Frank
The attorneys in the case of Bachmann v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 6:20 am
Relevant to the times in which we find ourselves, the Delaware Court of Chancery, in a newly released transcript ruling in K-Bar Holdings LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:23 am by Aaron Olsen
In Alonzo, a federal district court granted summary judgment in favor of our client MAXIMUS, Inc. on the plaintiffs’ time rounding claims. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 5:52 am by Daily Record Staff
In this timely, pro se appeal, Stansbury raises one issue, which we quote: Did the trial judge Yolanda L. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:48 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Personal jurisdiction is one of those basic concepts in civil procedure that evokes strong memories in most lawyers, of their first year in law school, cases like International Shoe, Burger King, Helicopteros, and World-Wide Volkswagen, and perhaps even a bit of painful nostalgia for a time when they were maybe a little overwhelmed by the process of learning the law. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:02 pm by Patent Docs
In short, it describes a class of structures or behaviors that are at least partially-invariant to time or scale. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
This focus puts putative interests the public may have in reducing present patent rights in favor of future ones, where granting such rights to present inventors (limited as they are in time) is more important that providing sufficient patent protection to permit exploitation and commercialization of the innovations disclosed... [read post]