Search for: "Towne Properties Inc" Results 161 - 180 of 891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2006, 1:30 pm
In an action to recover some of the fees paid, the Appellate Division Third Department, in Properties of New York, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:23 am by etoupin
The company was pursuing the property under the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Brownsfield program, which encourages developers to take on the costs of toxic waste cleanup in exchange for alluring property prices. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 4:47 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Additionally, inasmuch as petitioners' negotiations with Long Energy centered around their viewshed concerns, respondents were not on notice that petitioners would commence this proceeding challenging the use of the property. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:41 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLC
Thus, the determination is not supported by substantial evidence (see generally Matter of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d 608, 613 [2004]; Matter of Expressview Dev., Inc. v Town of Gates Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 147 AD3d 1427, 1428-1429 [4th Dept 2017]). [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
 Plaintiff Sullivan Farms II, Inc. has stated plausible claims for relief under § 1983, § 1985, and the FHA ... [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 1:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc., 136 Vt. 213, 218 (1978), (citing 11 C. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
    "In connection with the third cause of action, the plaintiff All Town Real Estate Associates, Inc. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm
"A denial of a special use permit must be supported by evidence in the record and may not be based solely upon community objection (see Matter of Green 2009, Inc. v Weiss, 114 AD3d 788; Matter of White Castle Sys., Inc. v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 93 AD3d 731). [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:57 am by Shea Denning
Spivey, 368 N.C. 739 (2016) (indictment alleging that the defendant injured real property identified as the “front patio, façade, and porch of the restaurant, the property of Katy’s Great Eats,” was sufficient to identify the specific parcel of real property injured even though Katy’s’ Great Eats was not identified by its proper legal name:  “Katy’s Great Eats, Inc. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
Since the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:40 am by Elizabeth Kruska
This is not the dam we're talking about.TransCanada Hydro Northeast Inc. v. [read post]