Search for: "U M
v.
B M, et al."
Results 161 - 180
of 182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Ho, Tom M. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
LEACH BUILDERS, LLC, ET AL., Petitioners, v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:47 am
Long post, lots of stuff to cover in this opinion.MillerCoors, LLC v. [read post]
Guest Post: Halliburton II Price Impact Defenses Can Limit Severity on Deficient Exchange Act Claims
12 Jan 2021, 2:19 pm
”[2] In 2019, Insurance Insider reported that TransRe’s “[m]ispricing on these liability lines has generated a $3bn to $5bn hole in reserves, stemming significantly from D&O. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
The original article on which this revised version is based was originally written before the initial decisio in FDIC v Perry was reported (about which decision, refer here). [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
"23 In Craven v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
In light of the Supreme Court decision this week in Kimbrough v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
In this blog, though, I’m most concerned with “fake news” that causes tangible harm; provocative fictions that can prompt panic and violence. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 5:08 pm
Ataca, também, ato do reitor da FUFPI, que determinou a suspensão de tal incorporação em obediência à referida decisão. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article, "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
First, there is a structural presumption of illegality if the post-merger HHI is (a) greater than 1,800 and (b) the change in HHI is greater than 100. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Frosh, Bowie knife laws are an important part of his argument, including with a citation to my article Knives and the Second Amendment, 47 U. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 10:24 am
This method was initially proposed by Andersen et. al. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
