Search for: "U-LINE CORPORATION" Results 161 - 180 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2020, 4:51 am by Peter Mahler
” Case No. 3: Chun You Cheng v Yang, 2020 NY Slip Op 50801(U) [Sup Ct Queens County July 9, 2020] The opening line in the analysis portion of Commercial Division Justice Leonard Livote’s post-trial opinion last week (read here) says it all: In this case, the parties invested millions of dollars in the construction of a multi-story building. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 4:17 am by Peter Mahler
Perlman, 2013 NY Slip Op 31518(U) (Sup Ct NY County July 3, 2013), decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Melvin L. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 8:35 am by Ana Popovich
” Along those lines, the letter states: “Professional dissent at Blue Origin is actively stifled. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm by Matthew Ackerman
Our firm has recently received many phone calls and emails from property owners about the International Transmission Company’s (ITC) $850,000,000 project across Calhoun, Branch, Eaton, Clinton, Gratiot, and Ionia Counties (specifically, U-21471, which goes from ITC Oneida Substation to Nelson Road Substation and U-21472, which goes from ITC Helix Substation to Hipple Substation). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 9:41 am by Sheppard Mullin
Alice Corporation (Appeal No. 2011-1301) ("CLS Bank"), decided a case of patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:12 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this month, in Matter of Markowitz, 2014 NY Slip Op 51739(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Dec. 10, 2014], Brooklyn Commercial Division Presiding Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Although Delaware embraces contractual flexibility, a corporation’s power to modify the basic corporate structure and rights and obligations conferred by the statute has been subject to longstanding limits – the so-called mandatory features of corporate law. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:16 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
According to Anthony: [Emil and Carol] defamed and slandered [Anthony] by publicly calling him a ‘thief’ claiming he took money for his own personal use from the Corporations; that he ‘manipulated the books’ of the Corporations; diverted assets for his own use; enriched himself at the expense of defendants herein; has taken improper loans from the Corporations; looted the Corporations; has misappropriated monies from the… [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 But fans need to be kept in line: “Just as the ambiguous line between orthodoxy and heresy played a policing role in the Middle Ages, uncertainty surrounding copyright infringement is essential in constructing the terms of the relationship between franchise owners and online communities. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 10:30 am by Jim Walker
  "Maintenance and cure" is a well-established legal doctrine which has existed in the U. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
Holding the “responsible corporate officer” responsible: addressing the need for expansion of criminal liability for corporate environmental violators. 3 Golden Gate U. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:33 am by Peter Mahler
An earlier post on this blog, examining a post-trial decision in Matter of Digeser v Flach, 2015 NY Slip Op 51609(U) [Sup Ct Albany County Nov. 5, 2015], described the minority shareholder’s dissolution claim under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law as a “classic case of minority shareholder oppression. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm by sydniemery
Chiappinelli’s work Jurisdiction over Directors and Officers in Delaware is cited in the following article: Megan Wischmeier Shaner, The Corporate Chameleon, 54 U. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 2:58 am by Peter Mahler
We call it deadlock dissolution when a 50% shareholder of a close corporation, who claims to be at an impasse with the other 50% shareholder, asks the court to dissolve and liquidate the corporation. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:00 pm by Steven Kaufhold
 Finally, Simmonds argues that the Ninth Circuit rule provides a workable and fair bright-line rule for application of Section 16(b). [read post]