Search for: "U. S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2017, 8:48 am
After settling with the tortfeasor following the accident, the Shermans notified State Farm of their intent to pursue a UIM claim u nder their own auto policy in February 2015. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 9:38 am
Court of Federal Claims Judge Lydia K. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm
Consumer protection Preemption BOTTOM LINE: District court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s state-based tort and fraud claims against manufacturers of bottled water, infant formula, and baby food consumed by plaintiff’s minor daughter was proper because federal law, which provides uniform labeling standards for bottled water, preempted plaintiff’s state-based bottled water claims, and, as to… [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 2:11 pm
The Supreme Court also rejected First Quality’s (and the Federal Circuit’s) position that courts for over a decade had relied on laches to reject claims for damages in patent cases. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:19 am
Union Pacific opposed the motion, asserting that any state law claim against the employees would be pre-empted by federal law. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:15 am
The post Federal Circuit Relies on Printed Matter Doctrine in Affirming Examiner’s Rejection of Claims Under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 7:11 am
Federal law, on the other hand, requires employees to file a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) before going to court. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 2:38 pm
The man’s RICO case accused the defendant of using racketeering activities in California to dodge the execution of the federal court judgment enforcing the arbitration award. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
The court of appeals concluded that the plaintiff’s claims were not preempted to the extent that they arose under this theory. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 12:02 pm
The issue is whether the Federal Arbitration Act permits courts, invoking the “federal substantive law of arbitrability,” to invalidate arbitration agreements on the ground that they do not permit class arbitration of a federal-law claim. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 5:55 pm
The First Circuit Court of Appeals has reversed a district court ruling from the lower court over whether bondholders of nearly $3 billion of debt issued by Puerto Rico’s Employees Retirement System (ERS) have a claim on the pension fund’s assets. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
A Chamber of the 2nd Senate of Federal Constitutional Court, comprising three of its eight judges, including the court’s president, Andreas Voßkuhle, reviewed the matter. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:44 am
But SmallGovCon readers also know there’s another possible forum for protests: the Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:02 am
Nov. 14, 2018), the Court of Federal Claims held that Timberline no longer had standing to bring its claims. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:34 am
” The Federal Circuit explained that, the prior material breach doctrine, a contractor’s claim against the government may be barred when the contractor breaches the contract through “fraud-based” contract. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:44 pm
The State of Montana claimed that all three rivers are navigable under federal law, and that their beds and banks are therefore public lands owned by Montana in its sovereign capacity under public trust principles. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Rejecting Burford Abstention, the Appellate Court Reinstates the Plaintiff’s Dissolution Claim Now we come to the more interesting part in which the court reversed the District Court’s Burford-based dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims for judicial dissolution and related relief. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:36 pm
Arrow Financial Services LLC (covered earlier here), which considers whether federal-question jurisdiction exists under 28 U. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 10:38 am
Batson filed suit alleging violations of federal antitrust law as well as California’s unfair competition law. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 11:42 am
C. 2254(d), federal habeas relief may not be granted with respect to any claim a state court has adjudicated on the merits unless, among other exceptions, the state-court decision denying relief involves “an unreasonable application” of “clearly established Federal law, as determined by” this Court. [read post]
