Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2018, 6:01 am
S. 48, 60 (2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 3:04 pm
Shore, 439 U. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:29 am
In this 10-year old case, Mawere v Landau 2023 NY Slip Op 34446(U), December 8, 2023 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 501184/12 Judge: Lawrence S. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:37 am
A recent case Carl v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
So, with all of that background, we return to FEF v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
Chesapeake), and one the subject of a Section 1071(b) civil action for review (U. of Alabama v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The Court also found that the signs are conceptually different, since a stylized letter ‘h’, or two interlaced letters ‘u’, could be perceived in Huawei’s mark, whilst the stylized letters of the initials of Chanel’s founder (Coco Chanel) can be discerned in Chanel’s mark.Thus, the General Court held that the marks at issue are different. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm
Rogers, 440 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2014, 9:32 am
The Court’s June 19 decision in Lane v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:21 pm
As she pulled out to pursue another car, she saw Brown’s marked lanes violation. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 3:43 am
Emerald Cities Collaborative, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 12:18 pm
S. 518, 555 (2006); District Attorney’s Office for Third Judi-cial Dist. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
In Matal v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Bell, Mark M. [read post]
24 May 2017, 6:00 am
Photo credit: Mark Fischer via Foter.com / CC BY-SA [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 4:19 am
Gilbo v Horowitz 2018 NY Slip Op 31844(U) July 31, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158727/2017 Judge: Margaret A. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
” 15 U. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:56 am
Malvasio v Savran; 2011 NY Slip Op 31763(U); June 30, 2011; Supreme Court, Nassau County Judge: Jeffrey S. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 10:35 am
Yet, this case is not really a “David v. [read post]
