Search for: "U.S. v. Lambert" Results 161 - 180 of 265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2011, 3:53 am
OMH, Lambert claimed, (1) found her to be her eligible for FMLA benefits on February 1995 but (2) terminated her in March 1995.The court never reached the merits of Lambert’s allegations, holding that [s]ince Lambert’s FMLA claim against the Office of Mental Health is predicated on a request for leave involving her own health condition (in contrast, for example, to a request for leave for the birth of a child), it is barred by the Eleventh Amendment.The court… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm by Aaron Barkoff
"  In support, Navinta cited the Federal Circuit's two off-label use decisions of 2003: Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
Naturally, the Twelfth Circuit follows all applicable precedents of the U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
At the hearing, Apotex argued that U.S. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:36 pm by Patent Docs
Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:00 pm by Robert Ambrogi
The same happens for names of well-known cases, so if you start to type “roe,” the case Roe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:21 am by Steve McConnell
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff'd by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008). [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:00 pm by Patent Docs
Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:10 pm by Will
Most notoriously, the Supreme Court fought this issue to a 4-4 draw back in 2008 (in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:32 pm by cdw
LEXIS 26 (Az 7/2/2010) Noncapital Lambert v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:15 am by Beck, et al.
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85, 98 (2d Cir. 2006), aff'd by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008). [read post]