Search for: "U.S. v. Lehman*" Results 161 - 180 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 2:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Thus, for example, the law did not, as was proposed, legislatively overturn the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 1:08 am
Indeed, as I noted here, the WaMu failure, the largest in U.S. history, has largely been relegated to yesterday’s news pile. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:26 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Here’s the Wall Street Journal under the demure title, “U.S. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:28 pm by Kevin
” Of course, you should really consider them before doing the bad thing in the first place, so this is sort of a fallback position. 1 See Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 1:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
The memo take great pains to emphasize that while the case was pending, the Second Circuit entered its opinion in Fait v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm by admin
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 9:47 pm
” [25] This “alternative uptick rule” would refer to the national best bid when determining the allowable bid price for short sales, which is less extensive than the previous approach. [26] This is different than the previous approach, which requires a more constant monitoring of a security, to determine the appropriate last sale price. [27] Also, because of this new approach for determining the bid price, it would be easier to program into trading and surveillance… [read post]