Search for: "U.S. v. Matte*" Results 161 - 180 of 31,909
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 1:19 pm by Stewart Baker
Atonio, 490 U.S. 642, 652-53 (1989), quoting Albemarle Paper Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:15 am by Telecommunications Practice Group
On May 7, 2024, the FCC released a Declaratory Ruling reclassifying “broadband Internet access service” (“BIAS”) as a “telecommunications service” subject to the jurisdiction of the FCC under Title II of the Communications Act. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” In the case law, there is something of a presumption in favor of intervention: “Whether intervention is sought as a matter of right under CPLR 1012 (a), or as a matter of discretion under CPLR 1013, is of little practical significance since a timely motion for leave to intervene should be granted, in either event, where the intervenor has a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the proceedings” (Maggi v U.S. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
., “state-authorized or state-chartered financial institutions”[3]—which, based on a plain reading of the Financial Institutions Codes, include Florida state-chartered banks, trust companies and credit unions, as well as Florida state-licensed branches, agencies, administrative offices, and representative offices of non-U.S. banks;[4] consumer finance lenders licensed under Chapter 516 of the Florida Statutes; and money services businesses licensed under Chapter 560 of the… [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 “Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4]  The U.S. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 “Obscenity” is one of a few categories of speech that may be regulated by states consistent with the First Amendment (see Penal Law § 235.00).[4]  The U.S. [read post]